CHO-K1 Stable Cell Line Generation CHO-K1 Stable Cell Line Generation

CHO-K1 Stable Cell Line Generation

  • Guaranteed High-Yield
  • Extensive Experience
  • Available Commercial Sublicense

Overview

Cell line generation plays a vital role in the process of drug development. Efficient production of cell lines for recombinant proteins and antibodies that meet industrial requirements can significantly save valuable time and reduce overall costs.


At Biointron, we offer a specialized cell line development service using ECACC-licensed CHO-K1 cells. Our experienced team ensures the rapid creation of high-yield cell lines, tailored to meet our clients' downstream CMC development needs. We pride ourselves on swift and efficient service in the biopharmaceutical industry.

CHO-K1 Stable Cell Line Generation Overview

Highlights

Guaranteed High-Yield

  • Guaranteed high yield of >5 grams/L for antibody production
  • Cell and process optimized
  • Fast turnaround time as short as 3 months

Extensive Experience

  • Proven track record in stable cell line development for more than 10 years
  • Successful delivery of over 100 high-yield cell lines
  • Streamlined and efficient process tailored to your specific needs

Available Commercial Sublicense

  • Research grade or commercial grade available
  • Commercial sublicense available
  • One-time sublicense fee

CHO-K1 Stable Cell Line Generation
Service Details

Service Step Service Description Timeline Deliverables
Option 1: cell line development
Gene synthesis and transient expression
  • Codon optimization and gene synthesis
  • Subcloning into expression vector
  • Transient expression
2-3 weeks
  • Gene optimized for the required expression system
  • Gene cloned in expression plasmid
Stable pool generation
  • Stable transfection
  • Stable Pool selection and amplification
8-9 weeks
Single clone selection and screening
  • Subcloning of the top producing clones
  • Characterization of clones
8-9 weeks
  • 50mL of the supernatant from stable pool
  • Detailed report
Primary Cell Bank Generation
  • Primary Cell Bank (PCB) preparation
  • PCB Stability Study
~3 months
  • Primary cell bank -tested for Mycoplasma
  • Certificate of Analysis
  • Detailed report
CHO-K1 cell report
  • Detail CHO-K1 cell line report and document
N/A
  • Detail CHO-K1 cell line report and document
Option 2: CHO-K1 cell sublicense service
CHO-K1 sublicense
  • Detail CHO-K1 cell line report and document
  • CHO-K1 sublicense agreement
3-5 days
  • 2 vial CHO-K1 suspension cell
  • Detail CHO-K1 cell line report and document
  • CHO-K1 sublicense agreement

Case Study

  • Case 1: Tag free vaccine protein
    Single cell image system is applied to confirm the monoclonality. The yield of the final obtained clone A is 2.31 g/L.
    Day 0
    Day 0
    Day 1
    Day 1
    Day 2
    Day 2
    Day 4
    Day 4
    Day 7
    Day 7
    Day 10
    Day 10
    Finally
    The stability of clone A is also tested by assessing the doubling time of the cells, cell density and yield.
    Stability Studies
    Subcultured in CD04 medium containing 25 uM MSX the doubling time:22 ± 1hours (Average: 22.6h)
    Feed batch
    Cells from passages 3, 8, 13, 18, and 23 were collected, and the cell density was assessed. The results indicated a consistent level of cell growth.
    Doubling Time of N108-54
    Cells from passages 3, 8, 13, 18, and 23 were collected, and the yield was assessed. The results indicated that over 90% productivity titer was retained for over 22 passages.
  • Case 2: Anti-PD-1
    Three single clones were selected, and their yield was assessed using three different commercial media. The results are as follows:
    Subclone Medium A (g/L) Medium B (g/L) Medium C (g/L)
    414203-N42-6-N1 3.19 5.5 2.63
    414203-N42-7-N1 6.48 2.78 1.9
    414209-N10-6-N1 7.82 9.02 7.72
    Both reducing and non-reducing CE-SDS analyses were performed to assess the purity of these three clones after one step of affinity purification. The results indicated >97% purity.
    R-CE-SDS
    Sample Name main peak % LMW % Total %
    Positive control (Pembrolizumab) 99.1 0.9 100.0
    B414203-N42-6-N1 98.8 1.3 100.0
    B414203-N42-7-N1 98.5 1.5 100.0
    B414209-N10-6-N1 97.8 2.2 100.0
    NR-CE-SDS
    Sample Name main peak % LMW % HMW % Total %
    Positive control (Pembrolizumab) 98.3 1.7 0.0 100.0
    B414203-N42-6-N1 94.6 5.4 0.0 100.0
    B414203-N42-7-N1 94.1 5.9 0.0 100.0
    B414209-N10-6-N1 93.3 6.4 0.3 100.0
    CEX-HPLC analyses were performed to assess the charge of these three clones. The results indicated a similar main component% compared to the positive control for the first two clones. Additionally, the first clone (B414203-N42-6-N1) shows the most similar basic component%.
    CEX-HPLC
    Sample Name Acidic component % Main component % Basic component % Total %
    Positive control (Pembrolizumab) 19.5 64.1 16.4 100.0
    B414203-N42-6-N1 16.0 69.7 14.3 100.0
    B414203-N42-7-N1 17.4 69.2 13.4 100.0
    B414209-N10-6-N1 18.1 44.6 37.3 100.0
    Currently, we have sublicensed the CHOK1BN cell line to dozens of customers, and the status of some customers' projects is as follows:
    Customer Type CLD PD Pilot Nonclinical IND Phase I Phase II
    1 Customer A ADC
    2 Customer G R-vaccines
    3 Customer H Mab
    4 Customer B Mab
    5 Customer C Fab
    6 Customer J R-vaccines
    7 Customer F R-glycoprotein
“With ECACC-licensed CHO-K1 cells, we can generate research grade or commercial grade stable cell lines, with the option for a one-time sublicensing fee for a perpetual and irrevocable license.”
Jing Cheng
Jing Cheng
Cell Line Generation Team

FAQs

  • What are CHO-K1 cell lines?

    Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines are derived from the ovary of adult, female Chinese hamsters. CHO cells were first established in 1957 by T. Puck, and were subsequently multiplied and optimized in vitro, allowing it to be cultured indefinitely. The CHO-K1 cell line was derived as a subclone from that parental CHO cell line. They are typically the preferred host expression system for recombinant antibodies due to their advantages in producing complex therapeutics and manufacturing adaptability.1

  • Why use CHO cells?

    One of the key advantages of CHO cells is their ability to produce complex proteins that are human-compatible, with post-translational modifications, such as glycosylation. This feature increases therapeutic efficacy, protein longevity, and reduces safety concerns. Furthermore, CHO cells are highly stable, having a high tolerance for fluctuations in temperature, acidity (pH), oxygen, and cell density. This adaptability makes them suitable for large-scale manufacturing, and the product can be delivered in up to several grams per liter.2

  • Stable vs. Transient Expression

    Stable expression involves the integration of the gene of interest into the genome of the host cell line, allowing for long-term, heritable expression. This is typically achieved by using viral vectors or plasmids containing the gene of interest and a selectable marker (e.g., antibiotic resistance gene) to facilitate the selection and isolation of cells that have successfully integrated the gene.

    Transient expression involves the direct introduction of the gene of interest into the host cells without integration into the genome. This is usually achieved through methods like transfection or electroporation.

    The use of either depends on your research goals. Typically, for long-term studies or consistent gene expression across multiple experiments, stable expression is preferred. But for quick screening or short-term experiments, transient expression can be more suitable.

  • Why are CHO cells used for therapeutic antibody production?

    There is an increasing number of recombinant antibodies being developed as therapeutic agents, with about 40 new antibody molecules undergoing clinical trials every year, most of which are produced from CHO cells.3,4 For instance, Trastuzumab is a therapeutic antibody that was expressed by CHO cells and is specific for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2).

References

  • Fischer, S., Handrick, R., & Otte, K. (2015). The art of CHO cell engineering: A comprehensive retrospect and future perspectives. Biotechnology Advances, 33(8), 1878-1896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.10.015
  • Xu, X., Nagarajan, H., Lewis, N. E., Pan, S., Cai, Z., Liu, X., Chen, W., Xie, M., Wang, W., Hammond, S., Andersen, M. R., Neff, N., Passarelli, B., Koh, W., Fan, H. C., Wang, J., Gui, Y., Lee, K. H., Betenbaugh, M. J., . . . Wang, J. (2011). The genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell line. Nature Biotechnology, 29(8), 735-741. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1932
  • Li, F., Vijayasankaran, N., Kiss, R., & Amanullah, A. (2010). Cell culture processes for monoclonal antibody production. MAbs, 2(5), 466-477. https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.2.5.12720
  • Zhang, J., Shan, L., Liang, F., Du, C., & Li, J. (2022). Strategies and Considerations for Improving Recombinant Antibody Production and Quality in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10, 856049. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.856049

Services & Products

Our website uses cookies to improve your experience. Read our Privacy Policy to find out more.